Forest land use contribution to livelihoods and food security of Nghe An’s ethnic people: Lessons learned for the REDD+ program


Authors

  • Nguyen Dinh Tien VNU University of Economics and Business
DOI: https://doi.org/10.57110/jebvn.v4i1.261

Keywords:

Livelihoods, Nghe An, REDD+, shifting cultivation

Abstract

Shifting cultivation activities were banned in the upland area of Nghe An Province to reduce deforestation and forest fires which were greatly affecting the livelihoods of ethnic people. This study evaluates the current land use and local people's awareness of the role of different land use types in their livelihoods when implementing the REDD+ program in Nghe An. The results show that the livelihoods of local people in Moi villages (Luc Da commune) and Diem villages (Chau Khe) mainly come from agricultural production. Income from forestry (acacia, bamboo, and non-timber forest products) accounts for 60% of total household income. Most households in the two villages suffer from food shortages for 3 to 8 months a year. The net profits from different types of land use show that bamboo brings high economic profits. Local people are not willing to convert crops to the REDD+ mechanism. Therefore, local authorities need to support people in improving their livelihoods and income from agricultural and non-agricultural activities.

References

Aju, P. C. (2014). The role of forestry in agriculture and food security. American Journal of Research Communication, 2(6), 109-121.

Caspersen, L., Gombert, A. J., Hommels, M., & Deller, M. (2018). Utilizing the nutritional potential and secondary plant compounds of neglected fruit trees and other plant species of the walnut-fruit forests in Kyrgyzstan. World Agroforestry - Research Data Repository. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=QN2019001259407

Chamberlain, J. L., Darr, D., & Meinhold, K. (2020). Rediscovering the contributions of forests and trees to transition global food systems. Forests, 11(10), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101098

Chau Khe People Committee. (2023). The annual social economic report in 2023.

Chazdon, R. L., Harvey, C. A., Komar, O., Griffith, D. M., Ferguson, B. G., & Mart, M. (2009). Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica, 41(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00471.x

Guerrero, M. C., Razal, R. A., & Ramnath, M. (2015). Non-timber forest products for food security, income generation and conservation in Asia. XIV World Forestry Congress. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281776274_Non-Timber_Forest_Products_for_Food_Security_Income_Generation_and_Conservation_in_Asia

Ha, T. T. T. (2015). Challenges in implementing REDD+ and recommendations for forest policies in Vietnam. Journal of Forest Science and Technology, 1-2015.

Härkönen, M., & Vainio-Mattila, K. (1998). Some examples of natural products in the Eastern Arc Mountains. Journal of East African Natural History, 87, 265-278. https://doi.org/10.2982/0012-8317(1998)87[265:SEONPI]2.0.CO;2

Kajembe, G. C., Mwenduwa, M. I., Mgoo, J. S., & Ramadhani, H. (2000). Potentials of non-wood forest products in household food security in Tanzania: The role of gender-based local knowledge. Gender, Biodiversity and Local Knowledge System. http://41.73.194.142/handle/123456789/1250

Lalaina, C. R., Kazuhiro, H., & Mitsuru, Y. (2011). Forest conservation and livelihood conflict in REDD: A case study from the corridor Ankeniheny Zahamena REDD project, Madagascar. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 3(12), 618-630.

Luc Da People Committee. (2023). The annual social economic report in 2023.

Miller, D. C., Munoz-Mora, J. C., Rasmussen, L. V., & Zezza, A. (2020). Do trees on farms improve household well-being? Evidence from national panel data in Uganda. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 3, Article 101. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.00101

Montreal & Eschborn. (2011). Biodiversity and Livelihoods-REDD-plus Benefits. Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity and German Society for International Cooperation (GIZ) GmbH.

Nguyen, D. T., Tran, D. V., & Nguyen, T. L. (2011). Too much focus on forest conservation, too little on food. Policy Brief, RECOFTC. https://forestindustries.eu/sites/default/files/userfiles/1file/RECOFTC_21July10_B2_web.pdf

Nyambo, A., Nyomora, A., Ruffo, C. K., & Tengnas, B. (2005). Fruits and nuts: Species with potential for Tanzania. Nairobi: Regional Land Management Unit, World Agroforestry Centre-Eastern and Central Africa Regional Programme.

Raj, A., Jhariya, M. K., Khan, N. (2022). The importance of forest for soil, food, and climate security in Asia. In: Öztürk, M., Khan, S.M., Altay, V., Efe, R., Egamberdieva, D., Khassanov, F.O. (eds), Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainability in Asia. Springer, Cham.

Ruffo, C. K., Birnie, A., & Tengnäs, B. (2002). Edible wild plants of Tanzania. Nairobi, Kenya: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida).

Temu, R. P. C., & Msanga, H. P. (1994). Available information and research priorities for indigenous fruit trees in Tanzania. In Proceedings of the Regional Conference on the Indigenous Fruit Trees of the Miombo Ecozone of Southern Africa (pp. 106-111). Mangochi, Malawi: ICRAF.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

25-02-2024

Abstract View

187

PDF Downloaded

92

How to Cite

Nguyen Dinh Tien. (2024). Forest land use contribution to livelihoods and food security of Nghe An’s ethnic people: Lessons learned for the REDD+ program. VNU JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 4(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.57110/jebvn.v4i1.261

Issue

Section

Original Article